On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 05:01:54PM +0000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:53:40AM -0500, dman wrote:
| > Is it standard practice for the smarthost to include the DU's IP in
| > the headers?
|
| RFC821 S4.1.1 (p.21 DATA):
[...]
| What makes you think that dialup is excluded from this
I don't know, I just thought maybe. Or maybe I wasn't thinking (more
likely!).
| [snip spamassassin config]
|
| > It doesn't use any DULs unless you add that to your own config.
|
| Sure, but since you're the authority on spamassassin here, having
| written the howto, you ought to know what you're saying.
It is _capable_ of the feature that was requested. To what extent it
uses it and to what extent it flags messages is up to your config.
(unlike exim's "true/false" view of RBL[1], SA attaches a score based
on the test and the score can be as high or as low as you wish, a
lower score gives less weight to the test)
I don't feel like I've been terribly articulate in this thread, so I
apologize for that.
-D
[1] I know exim has "warn" instead of "reject", but it is an
all-or-nothing operation
--
A perverse man stirs up dissension,
and a gossip separates close friends.
Proverbs 16:28
