Re: [Exim] Bcc: not stripped

ph10@??? (Philip Hazel) wrote on 06.02.02 in <Pine.SOL.4.33.0202061034480.8510-100000@???>:

> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Vladimir Ivaschenko wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using Exim 3.30, and have noticed that e-mail addresses
> > specified in Bcc: are not hidden. I have sent several test
> > e-mails to destinations at different mail servers, and in all the
> > messages I could see the Bcc: with all the original recepients.
> >
> > Is there a specific switch which adjusts Bcc: functionality?
>
> No. RTFM. Search for "bcc" in spec.txt, or look in the index in the HTML
> version. Section 49.2 (entitled "The Bcc: header" - now there's a
> giveaway :-) describes exactly how Exim handles Bcc: headers. This is
> also FAQ5012.

And if Exim's handling of this isn't enough for you, you can investigate
headers_remove foir a brute-force solution.

MfG Kai