Thanks, that explains it.
dman wrote about "Re: [Exim] Bcc: not stripped":
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:28:44AM +0200, Vladimir Ivaschenko wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | I'm using Exim 3.30, and have noticed that e-mail addresses
> | specified in Bcc: are not hidden. I have sent several test
> | e-mails to destinations at different mail servers, and in all the
> | messages I could see the Bcc: with all the original recepients.
> |
> | Is there a specific switch which adjusts Bcc: functionality?
>
> RFC2821 (the one that specifies SMTP) doesn't mention Bcc: at all.
> Thus exim doesn't have to (indeed, shouldn't) tamper with it. In
> fact, the only piece of the DATA (message) that exim should touch is
> simply adding a Received: header.
>
> If your MUA wants to announce to the world who it is sending the
> message to, exim won't interfere. The solution is to tell your MUA
> not to do that!
>
> 'man muttrc' includes this
>
> ~~~~~~
> write_bcc
> Type: boolean
> Default: yes
>
> Controls whether mutt writes out the Bcc header
> when preparing messages to be sent. Exim users may
> wish to use this.
> ~~~~~~
>
> If you're using mutt, set this to "no" and you'll be all set.
>
> -D
>
> --
>
> If you hold to [Jesus'] teaching, you are really [Jesus'] disciples.
> Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
> John 8:31-32
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
Best Regards
Vladimir Ivaschenko
Certified Linux Engineer (RHCE)
