>Subject: Re: [Exim] unrouteable vs unknown local-par
>Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:30:43 -0800 (PST)
>From: exim@??? (Jim Pazarena)
>Next question, is that even tho I have used the "fail" as above
>(and it WORKS .. thanks!)
>the log files (both main & reject) still show that the message was
>rejected as "Unrouteable address", where they should more properly reflect
>"Unknown local part" as in the fail message.
>Any way around this Philip?
>I repectfully request that the log files be able to log the fail message.
>Or, alternately, that the config file has a router option which can change
>the default from unrouteable to unknown.
>--
How embarrasing.
If you 're-hup' exim, then yes indeed the logs reflect the fail message.
Sorry.
--
Jim Pazarena mailto:paz@qcislands.net
http://www.qcislands.net/paz
