>On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Patrice Fournier wrote:
>> Quoting Philip Hazel <ph10@???>:
>>
>> > > just talking into the wild, as i haven't yet come to touch v4, what
>> > > about adding a final router that just :fail:s ?
>> >
>> > Exactly.
>> >
>> > cant_route:
>> > driver = redirect
>> > allow_fail
>> > data = :fail: Unknown local part
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to restrict that router to local domains only? You
>> don't want to look like you treat a remote address as local if one ever
>> reaches that router.
>Oh, sure, if necessary. It depends on how the earlier routers are
>defined. They may filter out all the other domains (the default Exim 4
>configuration works like that).
This is how I was using the configure file, so at this point the address
_must_ be a local domain.
Next question, is that even tho I have used the "fail" as above
(and it WORKS .. thanks!)
the log files (both main & reject) still show that the message was
rejected as "Unrouteable address", where they should more properly reflect
"Unknown local part" as in the fail message.
Any way around this Philip?
I repectfully request that the log files be able to log the fail message.
Or, alternately, that the config file has a router option which can change
the default from unrouteable to unknown.
--
Jim Pazarena mailto:paz@qcislands.net
http://www.qcislands.net/paz
