On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 07:24:34PM +0000, Philip Hazel wrote:
| On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, dman wrote:
|
| > Will it be possible to keep them separate? I can imagine that it may
| > be useful to handle incoming and outgoing messages differently.
|
| Define "incoming" and "outgoing", please. Chances are you'll end up with
| something like "incoming = from a remote host" or "incoming = from a
| remote host that isn't on my local LAN". Fine. You can write conditions
| for that in Exim 4.
"incoming" == "this is the last stop" (now deliver it to a folder)
"outgoing" == "not staying here" (hand it off to the next system)
Kinda like an airport or a train station, "departures" and "arrivals".
See my previous post (about 2 seconds ago), Dave C. cleared it up.
| > message_type = incoming
| > message_type = outgoing
| > message_type = incoming : outgoing
| >
| > What do you think?
|
| I don't think there is a common definition of "incoming" and "outgoing"
| that makes it possible to implement this in a useful way.
Right. As Dave C. said, all message come in and go out, one way or
another :-).
-D
--
But As for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.
Joshua 24:15
