Author: Patrice Fournier Date: To: John Dalbec CC: exim-users Subject: Re: [Exim] malformed recipients vs. set sender
I did try to send a message with a similar address in IMP 3.0 and it
wasn't rewritten before it was sent to Exim. If I try to write it as you
showed it was rewritten, I still get only one error message. It shows
problems in Exim: The first line of the copied message is missing (there
seems to be a fix for this in Exim 4) and there is no log for the received
message only the log for the bounce. As the command returned a failure
code, shouldn't Exim not write a bounce? (with the default settings) Or at
least write something in the log so we know where the bounce comes from?
(This is by giving the recipients on the command line)
If I use -t instead, I get something similar to your (the message shows in
the logs and I get two error messages, but they are addressed to the
address specified by -f..) but I can't get the third bounce message to
generate. Have you tried to generate a debug log of the session between
IMP and Exim? Have IMP call Exim with -d9 and log the output to a file...
