On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, John Dalbec wrote:
> I've attached the bounce messages, hopefully this will prove enlightening.
> Exim bounces the mail correctly IMO. My concern is that one bounce is sent to
> the set sender and two are sent to the web server user. Shouldn't all the
> bounces go to the set sender?
Is "apache" a trusted user? If not, the first two bounces are exactly
what I would expect from a process running as "apache" that submitted
the bad message, because an untrusted caller cannot set a sender.
The third bounce is mysterious. The mystery is that the headers quoted
in the copy of the message do not contain the Received: header that Exim
adds to all messages.
> From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@???>
> To: jpdalbec@???
> Subject: Mail failure - malformed recipient address
> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 08:44:25 -0500
>
> A message that you sent contained a recipient address that was incorrectly
> constructed:
>
> UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTER_ADDRESS@.SYNTAX-ERROR. domain missing or malformed
>
> Recipient addresses must not end with a '.' character.
>
> The message has not been delivered to any recipients.
>
> ------ This is a copy of your message, including all the headers. ------
>
>
> Subject: test
> Message-ID: <1010411065.3c39a63949f58@???>
> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 08:44:25 -0500 (EST)
> From: John Dalbec <jpdalbec@???>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.7
> X-Originating-IP: 150.134.8.36
I don't understand this at all. Does it show up on the Exim log? Without
a Received: header, there's no record of the Exim message-id which could
be used to identify it.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
