Re: [Exim] malformed recipients vs. set sender

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Patrice Fournier
Date:  
To: John Dalbec
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] malformed recipients vs. set sender
Quoting John Dalbec <jpdalbec@???>:

> > > Exim produces 3 error messages. One for the delivery failure of
> jp@dalbec, and
> > > two for the malformed recipient address. However, only one of the
> "mailformed
> > > recipient address" messages is returned to the set sender of the
> message. The
> > > other two errors are sent to the web server user. Is this a bug?


> Return-path: <apache@???>


Ah! User apache either does not use -f to set the sender or it is not a
trusted user for Exim. (That does not explain the third reply though!) And
IMP is at fault to recognize an invalid address, modify it and pass it to
Exim...

--
Patrice Fournier
pfournier@???