Re: [Exim] exim router rights

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Philip Hazel
Date:  
À: Funk Gabor
CC: exim-users
Sujet: Re: [Exim] exim router rights
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Funk Gabor wrote:

> (I also missed the
> availability for separating routers, directors, transports into separate
> files, but now I have less routers, so I don't worry about it as much).


There is a ".include" facility in Exim 4.

> If I could just do something like this after the 3rd router
> new_address = :fail: no matching $local_part in domain $domain...
> then I suppose it would be fine, wouldn't it?


The "new_address" option is for smartuser, which is a director, not a
router.

> Can I?


Not in Exim 3.

In Exim 4, the distinction between routers and directors has been
abolished, and there are only "routers" (which include the things that
were previously called "directors"). So in Exim 4 you can put an
explicit :fail: in the router list if you want to.


--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.