On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Enrico Zini wrote:
I have not been following this thread very closely, but from what I've
gathered, I think it should be possible to do what you want. It should
be possible to change almost everything in a -C configuration. I do it
myself when testing Exim.
> > > Another question: how can I tell the second exim configuration to route
> > > the messages to be delivered locally through the first one?
Set up a director that just sends it to an SMTP transport that sends it
to 127.0.0.1 port 25.
> > > When some
> > > delivery fails, exim tries to notify the sender by e-mail, but since it
> > > is running as www-data it cannot do local deliveries. Should I just
> > > tell it that no addresses are local and let it go through the usual MX
> > > routing for local messages, too?
You could also do that. You'll need to set "self=send" on the router.
> The questions I have now are:
> 1) Why aren't tose messages I get in exim's stderr (as reported in the
> previous post) being written to the logs?
Sorry, I wasn't paying attention and haven't time to seek out which
messages these were. Note that some messages are written to the logs
only if the log level is high enough, but they will all appear on stderr
while debugging.
> 2) Can I just say to the second exim that deliveries for the local
> hostname and localhost are to be delivered via SMTP to localhost,
> where the primary exim is listening?
Yes.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
