On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 12:02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On 07 Dec 2001 10:02:52 GMT, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
> > The basic idea is that VERP is good since it allows more reliable
> > identification of bouncing addresses for mailing lists, but bad since it
> > requires each message to be sent in a different envelope.
>
> Does VERP offer any advantages to mailing lists that already use a
> per-message sender address that uniquely identifies its recipient?
Thats *is* VERP
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ Phone: +44 1423 850000 Fax +44 1423 858866 ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
