On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> Not sure, there's probably a transport option to be able to tell Exim
> to do smtp without pipelining.
No, I'm afraid there isn't.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Chris Thompson wrote:
> It does seem that Exim could have been clearer in its log that the protocol
> error was in response to a RCPT, even though (because of pipelineing) it
> had got as far as sending DATA.
Indeed. Point noted.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Dave C. wrote:
> Perhaps exim should quote the response, to make the case of a blank line
> (or any other non obvious response) more obvious?
The problem is that if you quote something with quotes in, it can also
be confusing. Maybe I should make it say <blank line> or something.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
