Re: [Exim] spam

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Kirill Miazine
Date:  
To: barry
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] spam
* barry <bazza@???> [20011130 16:03]:
> all claiming to be from various, and non existant @bazza.com addresses, so
> all the addresses that the spams weren't reaching, were bouncing back, and
> hitting my box (fun). I managed some investigation and got a catchall rule as
> follows
>
> catchall:
> driver = smartuser
> new_address = test
> end
>
> where test is aliased to /dev/null, causing a bypass


Since addresses does not exist, wouldn't receiver_try_verify help you?

When a message comes to a nonexistent account it will be welcomed with
something like:
550 Unknown local part blah in <blah@???>

This should also save you *a lot* of bandwith.

--
Kirill