Re: [Exim] Weird behavious WRT Sender: header

Etusivu
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: Dave C.
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: exim-users
Aihe: Re: [Exim] Weird behavious WRT Sender: header

Ok, the source doesnt lie, and it answers this question.

if there is a Sender: header present in the incoming messages, it is
removed (Its still in the -Mvh output, and I just figured out the "*"
before it means it was 'removed'), presumably becuase exim is going to
force insert a Sender: headers with the local users login info.
Apparently the code that removes the Sender: header wasn't updated to
allow for untrusted_set_sender.

That doesnt make me happy though. This particular webserver is running
suidCGI type scripts, but the local user logins dont corrospond to
any valid email addresses. I just want to force a

"Sender: <MAILER-DAEMON@???>"

on all messages sent through this script..


On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Dave C. wrote:

>
>
> I have exim 3.33 running on a freebsd box. There is a script being
> called, which uses BSMTP to submit a message to exim.
>
> I have added no_local_from_check, and the script itself inserts a valid
> Sender: header to the message. (This is coming from a www form, and the
> From: may or may not be valid)
>
> In one specific case where the From: is invalid, and this server goes to
> send this message to another Exim machine (also 3.33, on linux), the
> remote server rejects the message 'no valid sender in any header' (i
> have header verifications on and want to keep it that way). BUT, it
> looks from the logs on the receiving server that the sending server is
> stripping out the Sender: header I have inserted.
>
> If I make a telnet session to port 25 on that server, and insert a
> message with the same invalid From: header, but include the same valid
> Sender: header, it accepts the message fine.
>
> exim -Mvh on the message on the sending server DOES show the Sender
> header in place and intact, it just doesnt seem to get sent with the
> rest of the message. I modified the script to add an X-Sender: header
> also, and it DOES go across.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>


--