On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> > The client sent HELO, not EHLO. That's basic (not extended) SMTP, which
> > does not include AUTH.
>
>
> isn't this kindof inconsistent with the behaviour of "Otherwise, Exim
> does not advertise AUTH, though it is always prepared to accept it." ?
Er, no. The client never sent AUTH!
Sorry, I was very brief in my response.
The client sent HELO, so Exim didn't advertise AUTH. Presumably that's
why the client never sent it, but that is the client's problem.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
