On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:40:38AM -0700, Aly S.P Dharshi wrote:
> Netscape is certainly a problem, we are going to phase it out soon for Exim
^
No, `the'.
> as a backend, but the overall issue is not Netscape, if the Exim relay
> doesn't effectively block that orbz test message then it goes thru and the
> Netscape server for some odd reason lets it go thru' hence blacklisting us.
What is happening was discussed some time ago by Mark Baker (Debian exim
maintainer) on this list.
(
http://www.exim.org/mailman/htdig/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20010910/029910.html)
This is why the netscape machine is actually the problem, and why you're
listed as "outputs"
> Return-Path: <bounce-RMxid9A5@???>
> Delivered-To: relay@???
> Received: (qmail 29740 invoked by uid 0); 30 Oct 2001 17:36:31 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.online.uleth.ca) (142.66.33.3) by
> 205.231.149.25 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 17:36:31 -0000
> Received: from vs2.uleth.ca ([142.66.3.54]) by mercury.online.uleth.ca
> (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with SMTP id AAA5C2F for
> <relay%orbz.org@???>; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:35:05 -0700
This recieved line is the appropriate one.
> Received: from relay.uleth.ca ([142.66.3.52]) by vs2.uleth.ca (NAVGW
> 2.5.1.13) with SMTP id M2001103010363524804 for <relay%orbz.org@???>;
> Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:36:35 -0700
> Received: from sender.orbz.org ([205.231.149.53] helo=orbz.org) by
> relay.uleth.ca with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15ycn2-0001J1-00 for
> orbz.org!relay@???; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:35:04 -0700
> Message-ID: <RMxid9A57fBEWxgJbvDQSPPzxezVwU8O.5.11@???>
> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:35:05 +0000
> From: ORBZ Tester <bounce@???>
> Errors-To: ORBZ Tester <bounce@???>
> To: ORBZ Relay Accepter <relay@???>
> Subject: ORBZ Relay Test
> X-RBL-Warning: (output.orbz.org)
So there you have it.
There is no exim problem.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <mbm@???> http://colondot.net/
