On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:57:26AM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > Philip, would you consider that as a feature for exim (whether you're the
> > one who writes it or not) or is this misguided?
>
> You could code this in Exim 4's ACLs on the secondary servers.
Cool.
> IMHO it would be better to arrange for the secondary servers to apply
> the correct recipient validation, but I realize that this isn't always
> possible/easy. [
Yeah, when your YP/LDAP database isn't available to your offsite MXes,
that can be hard.
> Exim 4 also has "call forward", btw.]
Aaaahh, that sounds even better.
Thanks
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page:
http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@??? for PGP key
