Going off on a tangent; since sender_verify_callback is an "expensive" check, is there a
way to limit it to specific users and aliases (for instance users who get more spam
because their email address or an alias pointing to them is on a website).
Regards,
Ryan
Rick Byers wrote:
>
> Hi,
> To cut down on spam, I've been using sender_verify and
> sender_verify_callback (my server has light load). However, instead of
> rejecting messages that fail verification, I'd prefer to just flag them as
> probably spam and have my procmail filters deal with it like all other
> spam. Is there any way to make exim add a message header (similar to
> X-Bad-ReturnPath) if sender verification fails? I've tried setting
> sender_verify_reject = false, but that doesn't appear to modify the
> message - just log warnings to the log files.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
Ryan Tracey
Thawte Certification
Lo! Men have become the tool of their tools.
-- Henry David Thoreau
