----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Ward" <gward@???>
To: "David Corbin" <dcorbin@???>
Cc: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Exim] receiver_verify_*
> [me]
> > There certainly is. How about
> >
> > receiver_verify_addresses= = !192.168.100.0/24
>
> [David Corbin]
> > Looks good as far as it goes. Are there really supposed to be two
equals
> > (=) in the above example?
>
> No, that was a typo.
>
> > I don't think that's what it does. Althought I didn't *directly* say
it,
> > x.y.z is fix.. Basically, I've get 4 bit subnet that I need to "cover".
> >
> > My concern with the solution you provide is that saying
> > "receiver_verify_address=!A:!B" is not logic-wise the same as !(A|B),
> > which is really what I want.
>
> Ah. OK, I'll use real numbers instead of x, y, and z. You want this:
>
> receiver_verify_addresses = !192.168.100.0/24 : !30.40.50.48/28
But *ANY* address will fail one of those two conditions. That's my point
when I say that exim allows me to say (!A or !B), but I don't think it
allows (!A and !B)
>
> ...for appropriate values of 30, 40, and 50. I'm sure this is covered
> in the Exim docs -- RTFM!
I did RTFM. At least one of them :) But just because RTFM doesn't mean I
find the answer.
>
> Greg
> --
> Greg Ward - software developer gward@???
> MEMS Exchange http://www.mems-exchange.org
>
>
