Well, I think I am right about smarthost.
I set my smarthost to no_verify and added a new router:
-----
lookuphost:
driver = lookuphost
verify_only
-----
Now `exim -bvs asdf@jkl`
does not verify, and good addresses are verified.
This trouble now is that all of my incoming messages cannot be verified.
here is a sample of my reject log
-----
2001-09-17 09:58:50 rejected MAIL FROM:<exim-users-admin@???>
H=localhost.localdomain (localhost) [12
7.0.0.1] temporarily unable to verify sender address (try again later)
-----
Any ideas on this part. Does my new routing look O.K.
The exim book has become my nightly reading. I am just beginning to
understand the architecture enough to figure this out.
I'll keep plugging away, but will hope to here from you.
Thanks
Michael
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:23:57AM -0700, Michael West wrote:
>
> Here is the output.
>
> The only thing I can think of is that this does not work in
> conjunction with smarthost.
>
> Let me know what you think
> -----------------
>
> exim -d9 -bv asdf@jkl
> Exim version 3.22 debug level 9 uid=0 gid=0
> Berkeley DB: Sleepycat Software: DB 2.4.14: (6/2/98)
> c138685-b.sttls1.wa.home.com in local_domains? yes (matched
> c138685-b.sttls1.wa.home.com)
> Actual local interface address is 127.0.0.1 (lo)
> Actual local interface address is 24.10.41.243 (eth0)
> Caller is an admin user
> Caller is a trusted user
> user name "root" extracted from gecos field "root"
> originator: uid=0 gid=0 login=root name=root
> sender address = root@???
> Verifying: uid=0 gid=0 euid=8 egid=12
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Verifying asdf@jkl
> asdf@jkl in web@???? no (end of list)
> jkl in local_domains? no (end of list)
> address asdf@jkl
> local_part=asdf domain=jkl
> domain is not local
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> routing asdf@jkl, domain jkl
> smarthost router called for asdf@jkl
> route_domain = jkl
> routelist_item = * mail bydns_a
> after handling route_lists items, matched = 1
> original hostlist=mail options=bydns_a
> expanded hostlist="mail" options=bydns_a
> DNS lookup of mail (A) succeeded
> Actual local interface address is 127.0.0.1 (lo)
> Actual local interface address is 24.10.41.243 (eth0)
> fully qualified name = mail.sttls1.wa.home.com
> mail.sttls1.wa.home.com 24.254.60.13 mx=-1 sort=-37
> routed by smarthost router:
> deliver to asdf@jkl
> transport: remote_smtp
> host mail.sttls1.wa.home.com [24.254.60.13]
> asdf@jkl
> deliver to asdf@jkl
> router = smarthost, transport = remote_smtp
> host mail.sttls1.wa.home.com [24.254.60.13]
> asdf@jkl verified ok as asdf@jkl
> search_tidyup called
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:23:58AM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Michael West wrote:
> >
> > > I am trying to use the sender_verify and sender_verify_hosts_callback
> > > but
> > >
> > > exim -bv asdf@jkl
> > > or
> > > exim -bvs asdf@jkl
> > >
> > > is successful for every syntactically correct address.
> >
> > Use the provided debugging facilities.
> >
> > exim -d9 -bv asdf@jkl
> >
> > What does that say?
> >
> > --
> > Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> > ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
> >
