Re: [Exim] Exim 4: Opinions sought

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Jim Knoble wrote:

> Then why not an expanded syntax which identifies a "non-expandable"
> regular expression? For example:

Yes, that is what I've done. See a previous posting. In fact, I've gone
for a "non-expandable" facility, without making it regex-specific.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.