On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:50:19 +0100, Rasputin wrote:
> Ah, no problem.
> I don't think exim does this anyway (although you'd probably
> know for sure, being the maintainer and all).
Well, not on a per-byte basis, but it might be an idea to allow the
administrator to choose to forego the fsync() calls in cases where
machine death is allowed to lose a few messages.
Exim calls fsync()
1) To flush an accepted message body to the spool.
