I am not concerned with the snowcrash.kulish.com email itself. I am
concerned with why, when kulish.com is listed in the local_domains, an email
addressed to noc@??? is NOT delivered locally...
su-2.05# /usr/local/sbin/exim -d 9 -v -bv noc@???
Exim version 3.33 debug level 9 uid=0 gid=0
probably Berkeley DB version 1.8x (native mode)
Caller is an admin user
Caller is a trusted user
originator: uid=0 gid=0 login=root name=Charlie Root
sender address = root@???
Verifying: uid=0 gid=0 euid=1003 egid=6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verifying noc@???
kulish.com in local_domains? yes (matched kulish.com)
kulish.com in percent_hack_domains? no (end of list)
address noc@???
local_part=noc domain=kulish.com
domain is local >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directing noc@???
calling system_aliases director
df_lookup entered: search type = lsearch
system_aliases director: lsearch key=noc
file="/etc/aliases"
search_open: lsearch "/etc/aliases"
search_find: file="/etc/aliases"
key="noc" partial=-1
LRU list:
7/etc/aliases
End
internal_search_find: file="/etc/aliases"
type=lsearch key="noc"
file lookup required for noc
in /etc/aliases
lookup failed
system_aliases director declined for noc:
userforward director skipped: verify 2 0 0
calling localuser director
queued for local_delivery transport: local_part=noc domain=kulish.com
errors_to=NULL
domain_data=NULL local_part_data=NULL
localuser director succeeded for noc
noc@???
deliver to noc in domain kulish.com
director = localuser, transport = local_delivery
noc@??? verified ok as noc@???
search_tidyup called
But yet, it doesnt end up noc's email.
CK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sheldon Hearn" <sheldonh@???>
To: "NOC - KP^2" <noc@???>
Cc: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Exim] local_domains
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:16:09 EST, "NOC - KP^2" wrote:
>
> > With the above line emails addressed like:
> > noc@???
> > noc@???
> > noc@???
> >
> > All the above emails should be delivered to the local user noc. Is this
> > correct?
>
> Only by the configured Exim. The rest of the world's MTA's need to know
> about this arrangement too for them to do the right thing.
>
> > And if my thinking is correct, why would the only one of the above that is > > delivered locally be noc@??? (which is the correct FQDN)? >
> You tell us. What does Exim do with the message and why? In other
> words, do this as root:
>
> /usr/local/sbin/exim -d 9 -v -bv noc@???
>
> Ciao,
> Sheldon.
