Re: [Exim] errors_copy

Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Dan Egli
Datum:  
To: Dave C.
CC: Philip Hazel, Phil Pennock, Exim Users
Betreff: Re: [Exim] errors_copy
Yes, and Yes.

Yes I Kill -HUPed the daemon (I'm not that daft! I even tried closing and
restarting the daemon to be SURE it re-read the config file)
Yes the daemon is controling the local domain shortcircuit.dyndns.org.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave C." <djc@???>
To: "Dan Egli" <eglidan@???>
Cc: "Philip Hazel" <ph10@???>; "Phil Pennock"
<Phil.Pennock@???>; "Exim Users" <exim-users@???>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Exim] errors_copy


>
> Next Idea - did you remember to send a HUP signal to exim after you set
> recevier_verify. It wont reread its configuration file until you do that
> (you could also stop and restart exim entirely)
>
> Also - is shortcircuit.dyndns.org a local domain on the machine in
> question? If not, it cant very well verify users for domains it doesnt
> handle..
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Dan Egli wrote:
>
> > I HAVE set reciever_verify, and it still does it. Observe:
> >
> > (note, I have no user on this machine called garbage)
> >
> > [root@shortcircuit /root]# telnet localhost 25
> > Trying 127.0.0.1...
> > Connected to localhost.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > 220 shortcircuit.dyndns.org ESMTP Exim 3.31 #2 Fri, 17 Aug 2001
> > 08:46:00 -0600
> > ehlo localhost
> > 250-shortcircuit.dyndns.org Hello localhost [127.0.0.1]
> > 250-SIZE
> > 250-PIPELINING
> > 250 HELP
> > mail from: <dan@???>
> > 250 <dan@???> is syntactically correct
> > rcpt to: <garbage@???>
> > 250 <garbage@???> verified
> >
> > Next Idea?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Philip Hazel" <ph10@???>
> > To: "Dan Egli" <eglidan@???>
> > Cc: "Phil Pennock" <Phil.Pennock@???>; "Exim Users"
> > <exim-users@???>
> > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Exim] errors_copy
> >
> >
> > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dan Egli wrote:
> > >
> > > > RCPT TO: <garbage@???
> > > > 250 <garbage@???> is syntactically correct
> > >
> > > > This mail should have been rejected since there is no garbage user!
> > >
> > > Only if you have set receiver_verify in the configuration.
> > >
> > > > Then a couple of seconds later, that machine opens up a new smtp
> > connection
> > > > to my box to deliver a failure notification.
> > >
> > > Correct behaviour, when receiver_verify is false.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> > > ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.

> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim

details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
> >
>
> --
>
>