On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, sebastien.ioannitis@??? wrote:
> I would like a director calling a pipe transport, but if
> and only if the pipe fails, I would like to run another
> director which in turn calls another pipe transport.
This is not possible. Directors do not run transports. They merely
decide which transports will be run during the "transporting" phase.
> One more thing, when disabling the ignore_status option
> (disabled by default), the error message bounced to the
> sender gives far too much details about the error. I just
> would like to give the failed addresses which seems not to
> be possible, even when errmsg_file or the inline version
> of it. Anything I can do ?
Which release of Exim? Later releases give a bit less detail than
before, I think.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
