Re: [Exim] header syntax checks

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMMSheldon Hearn at <-
.MMPhilip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Sheldon Hearn
Date:  
To: Philip Hazel
CC: Phil Chambers, exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] header syntax checks

On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:40:51 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:

> RFC 2822, which has replaced RFC 822, does not require any recipient
> fields.

Was it a requirement in RFC 822? If so, I finally understand why so
many mail clients insist on doing something stupid with To: when Bcc: is
used.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] PGsql lookup - strange behaviour ?Re: [Exim] header syntax checks->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)