Circa 2001-Jul-03 07:03:46 +0530 dixit Suresh Ramasubramanian:
: +++ Phil White [exim-users] <02/07/01 23:00 +0100>:
: > Most of the others I feel are too ambiguous - do they really represent a
: > threat?
:
: None of these headers represents a threat.
Really? Let's see:
[...]
Received: from blackehlo.cluestick.org ([202.169.130.31])
by blrnd2.bplnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f631Q4d08366
for <exim-users@???>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 06:56:05 +0530 (IST)
Received: (from suresh@localhost)
^^^^^^^^^
by blackehlo.cluestick.org (8.11.4/8.11.4/clue-1.0) id f631Xkf00683
for exim-users@???; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 07:03:46 +0530 (IST)
(envelope-from mallet@???)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Looks like some guy named 'suresh' wrote this message, with an email
address of <mallet@???>.
[...]
Message-ID: <20010703070346.C620@???>
^^^^^^^^^^^
Yep---definitely. And not only do we have another email address for
him, but an actual address and telephone number as well:
$ whois hserus.net |grep -A 5 'Contact:'
Administrative Contact:
Suresh Ramasubramanian domains@???
Suresh Ramasubramanian
106D, Aditya Enclave, Ameerpet
Hyderabad, AP 500038
in
--
Technical Contact:
Suresh Ramasubramanian domains@???
Suresh Ramasubramanian
106D, Aditya Enclave, Ameerpet
Hyderabad, AP 500038
in
$
He's probably reachable via some address @hserus.net as well.
All in all, that doesn't look particularly harmless to me.
: > Any user wanting total anonymity would want to use a 'real' anonymous
: > remailer service.
So what's the point of your remailer? It's like disguising yourself by
wearing a hat, or by wearing a nametag that reads, "Hello, my name is
Xavier," when it's really Yvonne or Zebedee. Neither fools people who
know what you look like....
--
jim knoble | jmknoble@??? | http://www.jmknoble.cx/
| jmknoble@??? | http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/
(GnuPG fingerprint: 31C4:8AAC:F24E:A70C:4000::BBF4:289F:EAA8:1381:1491)
