Re: [Exim] RFC 2821 and "headers_sender_verify"/"headers_che…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nigel Metheringham
Date:  
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
CC: Exim Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Exim] RFC 2821 and "headers_sender_verify"/"headers_checks_
mallet@??? said:
> Which is not an argument against using home-cooked headers (X-Loop in
> several procmail based autoacks, X-Been-There in Mailman, etc). And
> in such cases, all you have to do is to suppress bounces on your side
> when you see the header.


I see a lot of autoreplies with *no* trace of the original message in
them, let alone unscathed headers.

    Nigel.
-- 
[ Nigel Metheringham           Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ Phone: +44 1423 850000                         Fax +44 1423 858866 ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]