Re: [Exim] RFC 2821 and "headers_sender_verify"/"headers_che…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Vadim Vygonets
Date:  
To: Exim Users Mailing List
New-Topics: Re: [Exim] RFC 2821 and "headers_sender_verify"/"headers_checks_
Subject: Re: [Exim] RFC 2821 and "headers_sender_verify"/"headers_checks_fail"
Quoth Greg A. Woods on Tue, May 15, 2001:
> Any mail that comes from outside the mail system istelf (i.e. the MTA
> itself), be it automatically generated or not must have a valid return
> address. The only thing that should ever generate empty sender
> addresses is the MTA itself.


Why?

> The "dueling autoresponder" situation is trivially handled by other
> simple and long proven techniques (eg. "Precedence:" headers).


Precedence: headers are not mentioned in any RFC, so depending on
these headers is Not A Good Thing[tm]. Empty envelope sender
address, OTOH, is well defined in the RFCs and is widely
recognized as the sign of "don't send me bounces".

Vadik.

--
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to
provide a test load.