[ On Tuesday, May 15, 2001 at 12:02:43 (+0530), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: [Exim] RFC 2821 and "headers_sender_verify"/"headers_checks_fail"
>
> There _is_ one other reason. When you send out autoresponders on a large
> scale (say an ISP's abuse ticketing system) and want to stop people from
> replying to the autoresponder (hitting reply-all instead of reply does this)
The autoresponder could use a legal RFC-x822 format group address
specification with an empty list, which should prevent any MUA from
replying. The group-name can be something like "you can not reply". :-)
The autoresponder should still use a legal and valid SMTP envelope
sender address other than "<>" of course.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <gwoods@???> <woods@???>
Planix, Inc. <woods@???>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@???>
