Re: [Exim] dumb ssmtp ${received_protocol} question

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MTamas TEVESZ at <-
MPeter Radcliffe at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Tamas TEVESZ
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] dumb ssmtp ${received_protocol} question
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:

>
> if ssl has been used to transmit a message to exim, why doesn't
> ${received_protocol} indicate that ? (ok, i admit `with assmtp' might
> look strange :)
>
> i'm really just curious if there are any resons behind this or `it is
> just so'.

It's just so. 


-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.




This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[Exim] mailman+exim+uucp != multiple recipient per rsmtpRe: [Exim] self=local equivalent->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)