Re: tmpnam vs mkstemp, was Re: [Exim] Problem with compiling exim-3.22 on Linux

Author: Philip Hazel
Date:
To: Adrian Phillips
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: tmpnam vs mkstemp, was Re: [Exim] Problem with compiling exim-3.22 on Linux

On 30 Mar 2001, Adrian Phillips wrote:

> I suggest seriously considering making the default to tmpfile with a
> fallback to tmpnam at least for v4.

There is no need for the fallback: tmpfile() is in the C standard (I
just forgot/didn't notice when I wrote that code).

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.

This message is part of the following thread:
	the complete thread tree sorted by date
	Philip Hazel at
	Adrian Phillips at

Re: tmpnam vs mkstemp, was Re: [Exim] Problem with compiling…