Quoth Phil Pennock on Tue, Mar 20, 2001:
> On 2001-03-20 at 13:23 +0000, Philip Hazel gifted us with:
> > #include /some/file/name
>
> Not "#include".
#definitely not.
> My vote, if I get one, is for ".include".
It's from BSD Makefiles. They did it to distinguish .directives
from $VARIABLES, #comments and targets: (or VARIABLE =
assignments). Same here, it will be distinguished from
everything else. So I'm all for this.
Vadik.
--
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to
provide a test load.
