> A include statement could actually be useful, though. Today you can > either generate the config-file or use -D options (or even have a special
> name for each file, using CONFIG_FILE_USE_NO), but neither are really
> perfect.
>
> I often have specific configurations for spesific hosts, but wish to more
> easily dist new exim.conf files. These host spesific files would most
> often be static, but the general exim file changes quite often.
Yes.
I know this one has been on list before, but as they say, just because it's
there doesn't mean you have to use it. Give us the rope and we will decide
if we should hang ... please. I could be happy to not allow recursive
includes - that should be a performance help.
