philipp@??? said:
> How about standard ini format?
No, please not that.
If you want to go for that sort of organization then going for a
complete parser would seem better - going basically bind 8/9 like
main {
}
transports {
smtp {
# smtp defs
}
}
ph10@??? said:
> Unless lots of people feel that this is an especially good idea, I
> don't really see the need to introduce syntax that involves a special
> character (the square brackets). Is the idea that it makes it stand
> out?
I quite like the idea of bracketing sections - makes it possible to use
syntax sensitive editors and do fast checks on things. However the ini
format does not support that at all.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ Phone: +44 1423 850000 Fax +44 1423 858866 ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
