leo@??? said:
> How the message passed thought the list with a Priority set so high ?
> (and in 2 copies !)
It was sent by the original sender twice - hence the 2 copies (I
suspect that when the first copy was held because he was not a list
subscriber, he subscribed and sent another, by this time I got to
releasing the held copy).
Mailman doesn't look at, set or consider Priority: headers. Are they
an RFC header or some strange vendor specific oddity? Precedence: was
the old RFC822 "urgency" header.
[This probably would have been more an issue to pass to me rather than
the list]
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ Phone: +44 1423 850000 Fax +44 1423 858866 ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
