On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:22:39 +0000 (GMT), Philip Hazel
<ph10@???> wrote:
>... and later asked if this message had got through. It had. It has now
>got to the top of my list of Exim-related messages for investigating. You
>are lucky - it is less than 48 hours since you posted it. Sometimes it's
>3 or more days before I get to some postings. I cannot spend all my time
>answering the list.
Sure. But you _usually_ answer _very_ fast to e-mail requests, and I
had really thought this might have been lost somewhere since you were
active on the list. Sorry about that.
>What currently happens with the FORCEFAIL message is that it gets logged
>with the ** line that indicates a failed delivery. In the case of
>verification, it seems to get lost. FORCEFAIL is an old feature,
>predating :fail: and I guess I never got round to making it behave
>similarly.
Is there any way to use :fail: in a router or any other way to have an
address fail in a router with a customized message after the 550?
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
