Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

Quoth Jeffrey Goldberg on Sun, Feb 18, 2001:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> > I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
> > deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?
>
> Or use "p" instead of "-" perhaps.

Or 1.2.3.4!25, as in Plan 9.

Vadik.

--
Real software engineers don't debug programs, they verify correctness.
This process doesn't necessarily involve execution of anything on a
computer, except perhaps a Correctness Verification Aid package.