Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

Top Pagina
Deze boodschap maakt deel uit van devolgende draad:
Mde volledige draad-boom gesorteerd op datum
M-\Jeffrey Goldberg op <-
M\MPhilip Hazel op ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Auteur: Philip Blundell
Datum:  
Aan: Philip Hazel
CC: exim-users
Onderwerp: Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines
>> IPv6 address literals are just a disaster anyway.
>
>Very true. What made them chose colon?

Dunno. Precedent set by Ethernet addresses, maybe.

>I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
>deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?

Sure, that looks OK to me.

p.




Deze boodschap werd naar devolgende mailinglijsten gestuurd:
Exim-users
Mailing Lijst Info | Nabije Berichten		<-[Exim] local delivery via smtpRe: [Exim] port number logging in received lines->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives beheerd door cumin AdminsLurker (versie 2.3)