Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Philip Blundell
日付:  
To: Philip Hazel
CC: exim-users
題目: Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines
>> IPv6 address literals are just a disaster anyway.
>
>Very true. What made them chose colon?


Dunno. Precedent set by Ethernet addresses, maybe.

>I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
>deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?


Sure, that looks OK to me.

p.