Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

>> IPv6 address literals are just a disaster anyway.
>
>Very true. What made them chose colon?

Dunno. Precedent set by Ethernet addresses, maybe.

>I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
>deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?

Sure, that looks OK to me.

p.