Re: [Exim] Filter vs. <> (empty sender)

Páxina inicial
Borrar esta mensaxe
Responder a esta mensaxe
Autor: Christian Balzer
Data:  
Para: exim-users
Asunto: Re: [Exim] Filter vs. <> (empty sender)
To answer my own question, it was the

if error_message then finish endif

line in my filter. Now while supposedly a null sender does indeed
constitute an error message the amount of spamware that uses this
method to bypass some filters is too big to be ignored. A mention
in the documentation of this behavior would be nice.

Also, since this is in the context of a filter transport, a "fail"
will not work, as the messages gets frozen and when thawed will
be delivered (provided you have the filter doing first_delivery
filtering only). So dropping it was the best solution.

Dewa,

<CB>
-- 
Christian Balzer        Network Engineer        Engineering
chibi@???       Exodus Communications K.K.
Phone: +81 3 4354 0290  FAX: +81 3 ??    http://www.exodus.co.jp/