At 20:37 10/01/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>one of those addresses (i.e. explicitely specify the adresses that can
>relay and maybe check them on routers' level). It's much worse than
That is done with the infamous setting that sparked this debate :)
>BTW, ist there any way to drop such a message with 550 error when it is
>routed by one of exim routers?
I believe that is kicked off at SMTP level.
Andromeda
- The Andromeda HTML Workshop -
http://www.htmlworkshop.com/
Home of Search & Replace 98