On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> > i agree that routers & directors should be combined, but as a networking
> > person, it'd be preferable to me if the new entity were not called a router.
>
> I did say "unless someone can find a better name". However, there have
> been no suggestions, and I don't think there is one. Also, people talk
> about "mail routing" regularly. This goes back to the days of RFC 821,
> and I think that's before Cisco or Nortel even existed.
>
how about mailrouter or emailrouter o mail_router ?
cheers
Marcos
> Anyway, routing a message is very similar in concept to routing a
> packet: both processes decide where the object is to be sent.
>
> --
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
