On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Andromeda wrote:
> At 19:20 20/12/2000 +0200, you wrote:
> >I realised that when I reread the system filter sections. It seems the
> >hide_child_in_errmsg option is what I may be looking for :)
>
> I've noticed that this option swallows the actual fail text that was
> specified. Is that by design or is that a problem?
Sorry, not sure exactly what you mean. Can you send me an example?
All the option is *supposed* to do is to suppress the child address.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
