Is there any reason why there should be a problem detecting X-UIDL header?
I've got the following in my system filter:
if $h_x-uidl matches ".+"
then
logwrite "SPAM TESTING (UIDL) : $h_x-uidl : $h_subject"
endif
but it didn't detect the following email ('>'s inserted by me)
>X-Persona: <Dennis@pctc>
>Envelope-to: dtaylor@???
>Received: from [210.23.229.51] (helo=www.faxtrack.net.ph)
> by rizzo.ipipeline.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
> id 13tNCu-0006dn-00
> for <dtaylor@???>; Tue, 07 Nov 2000 20:51:33 -0800
>Received: from 210.69.90.10 (1Cust210.tnt2.poinciana.fl.da.uu.net
[63.39.111.210])
> by www.faxtrack.net.ph (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA02049;
> Wed, 8 Nov 2000 12:13:09 +0800
>From: Curtis6666@???
>Message-ID: <000070cc77e0$0000029e$00000ded@195.17.249.97>
>To: <Undisclosed.Recipients@www.faxtrack.net.ph>
>Subject: Bulk Mailing
>Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 22:33:27 -0700
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-RBL-Warning: (relays.orbs.org) Open relay - see
http://www.orbs.org/verify.php3?address=210.23.229.51
>X-UIDL: c"k!!#:V"!hV,#!KY2!!
>
> I'LL BULKMAIL FOR YOU
>
>
---
Dennis Taylor
---
Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas
are any good,
you'll have to ram them down people's throats.
