Hello Philip and Peter,
Sorry about it.
I've substituted received_header_text because I would
like to minimize internal information on the Received
header.
All information must be recorded this time.
###
Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Peter Galbavy wrote:
>
> > In that case, the Received: lines I looked at in Toshio Kumagai's "success"
> > response didn't contain that:
> >
> > Received: by ginger with esmtp (Exim 3.163 #1)
> > id 13dgaQ-0000si-03; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 07:18:58 +0900
> >
> > Toshio, are you sure it went TLS/SMTP ?
>
> It should look like this:
>
> Received: from [::1]
> by myhost.test.ex with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
> (Exim x.yz #nn)
> id 10HmaY-0005vi-00
> for ph10@???; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
>
> --
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
>
> --
--
Toshio Kumagai (Toshio_Kumagai@???), Japan
