On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> I agree that it would make configuring and installing easier, but I'm not
> sure that it makes sense to have a security crucial portion of the TLS
> operation thrown in when there are external utilities that will do the
> job. I guess we could have a choice between the three:
Thanks, everybody, for all the random comments :-) which I will digest.
I guess I should add a few additional options, leaving the default to
use an internal seed. Meanwhile, I'm more interested in having the rest
of it tested...
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
