Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or r…

On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Greg A. Woods wrote:

> I've never, ever, not once, seen '<>' appear in an automatically
> generated RFC-822 header, especially not in a bounce, and I can't find
> any evidence of it either in my RFC collection, nor in of my megabytes
> of archived real e-mail.

That's because it is syntactically invalid according to RFC 822.

> I.e. this is not something you can standardise without making people
> angry at the standard and it authors! ;-)

Precisely. There are strongly held views on all side of this one.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.